🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to resume atomic negotiations with the United States provided that it is approached with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat declared solely negotiations was effective, and disclosed new appeals had been made by go-betweens to resume talks with the American leadership. He asserted Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Iran could not yet authorize the global atomic watchdog to inspect struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Navigating a Difficult Route

Araghchi is treading a difficult path since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be operating from a situation of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out more resilient defensively and mentally from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will never give up" – the main reason of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Earlier Talks Unexpectedly Concluded

The earlier sessions of discussions between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that concluded with the US president asserting the locations had been obliterated. Following this, EU nations exercised their right to reimpose international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with American involvement could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could function on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats stated on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with the US representative the US official only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Situation

Tehran representatives declared the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be resurrected in some form if discussions restart.

Trump last week claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to resume discussions, but privately Iranian officials state they are not yet getting coherent offers from the United States either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of passivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran asserts negotiations is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Stance

In his speech to the forum, designed to paint the US as a controlling nation that abuses the notion of international law, Araghchi said the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the dispute could not be settled by armed force. He said the assaults commenced with a US demand for an total Iran submission and culminated with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were executed with complete American awareness and collaboration, making confidence difficult to restore.

Dialogue Continues the Final Solution

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned diplomacy; it was America and the western countries that had always sought to dictate their demands during the discussions. Negotiations can still be active and remains the final resolution to resolve conflicts, but its standards, guidelines and tenets must be respected."

"If they address to the Iranian people with the tone of respect and honor, they will receive a response in the identical language."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the battle of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was assured Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We acquired numerous insights from this conflict; we have discovered our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He continued: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to destroy, continues to exist. The installations and equipment, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is important is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but did not succeed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have grown more powerful, more integrated, and more supportive of the leadership and the nation in the aftermath of this attack."